Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 66.69 |
Liaison | Margaret Lo |
Submission Date | Dec. 16, 2015 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Ball State University
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.31 / 1.00 |
Matt
Stephenson Senior Director of Business Services for Purchasing, Printing, and Contracts Business and Auxiliary Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase office paper that has recycled content and/or is certified to meet multi-criteria sustainability standards for paper?:
Yes
None
A copy of the paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
None
The paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
---
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed :
The Council on the Environment (COTE) adopted on November 4, 2002 a "30% Recycled Paper Resolution" which recommended that the university central stores phase out and eliminate the purchase of printer and copier paper with 0% post-consumer recycled content and switch to 30% post-consumer recycled content paper. COTE estimated that switching to a 30% PCC paper would save over 3000 trees, 800 million BTUs of energy, and 100,000 pounds of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions in the atmosphere.
None
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on office paper)?:
Yes
None
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
Expenditure Per Level | |
10-29 percent | 301.74 US/Canadian $ |
30-49 percent | 26,113.31 US/Canadian $ |
50-69 percent | 2,210.62 US/Canadian $ |
70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled label) | 3,479.11 US/Canadian $ |
None
Total expenditures on office paper :
203,295.96
US/Canadian $
None
The website URL where information about the paper purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.