Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 69.22 |
Liaison | Leslie Raucher |
Submission Date | Dec. 11, 2023 |
Barnard College
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.33 / 3.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
447,544,000
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 5,190,741 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 1,654,888 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
The $6.8M represents investment across energy transition focused funds and funds with a positive / proactive ESG focus.
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
1.53
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
No
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
---
None
The sustainable investment policy:
---
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
No
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
---
Proxy voting
No
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
---
Shareholder resolutions
No
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
---
Divestment efforts and negative screens
Yes
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
The college will divest from directly held funds from fossil fuel companies found to thwart or deny climate science. The college has a published a list of 30 fossil fuel companies that were evaluated based on criteria developed by a working group of Barnard faculty, students, and staff, in consultation with Fossil Free Indexes (FFI) and the Union of Concerned Scientists. This list will be used to guide investment decisions toward companies that support climate science and act to mitigate the risks posed by climate change.
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
5
Investor networks
No
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
---
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.