Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 45.28 |
Liaison | Nina Bisbee |
Submission Date | Sept. 22, 2023 |
Bryn Mawr College
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.40 / 3.00 |
Nina
Bisbee Director Facilities Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
We used the Sustainability Indicator Management & Analysis Platform (SIMAP), which was developed by the University of New Hampshire Sustainability Institute. This tool is recommended as the industry standard by both Second Nature and AASHE.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
Yes
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
The data used for the GHG emissions inventory was collected by facilities staff and reviewed and verified by our Associated Director of Facilities and Energy Management. The data was then further reviewed and complied in a report by The Stone House Group, a third party external consultant with experience in developing green house gas inventories.
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 3,116.80 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 377.50 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
3,494.30
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | Yes | 280.90 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | Yes | 893.10 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | Yes | 1,390.40 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Capital goods | --- | --- |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | Yes | 1,522.80 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | Yes | 184.70 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | No | --- |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
4,271.90
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
For Business travel we used expenditures by type of travel to estimate mileage. Business travel includes study abroad travel. For commuter information, we used zip code data and railpass program participation data to determine commuter modality and distance. For waste generation we used waste tonnage which was offset by methane recovery at the landfill. We calculated food and paper purchases from financial data. Purchased goods includes food and paper. Other sources includes wastewater.
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
No
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | --- |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | --- |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | --- |
Particulate matter (PM) | --- |
Ozone (O3) | 0 Tons |
Lead (Pb) | 0 Tons |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | --- |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | 0 Tons |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | --- |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | --- |
Area sources | --- |
Mobile sources | No |
Commuting | No |
Off-site electricity production | No |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
---
Optional Fields
---
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.