Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 65.59 |
Liaison | Victor Udo |
Submission Date | Sept. 23, 2019 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Bucknell University
OP-16: Student Commute Modal Split
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.52 / 2.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total percentage of students (graduate and undergraduate) that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary means of transportation:
76
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting, including the timeframe for when the analysis was conducted and how a representative sample was reached, if applicable:
In 2004, a traffic study was conducted that included machine (traffic tube) counts of vehicles and manual pedestrian and parking counts on campus. The pedestrian counts were conducted at major intersections at peak times on two different days. Additionally, a random survey was conducted in 2006 that received 149 responses. This info was projected for the entire campus and is the source for the data in this section. Prof Beiler (Civil Eng) has used students over multiple academic years to conduct traffic surveys as part of a class and in 2017 a traffic (parking) study was conducted. Data from these surveys was not available and is not included in this analysis. No other more recent information is available. Note: In 2015, the University completed four new residence buildings moving 344 students back onto campus where they primarily walk around campus. Prior to this, the students lived off campus with many of them driving to campus. So while we are utilizing very old survey data, we believe it represents a conservative view (higher carbon footprint) of the current commuting situation.
Optional Fields
Percentage (0-100) | |
Commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) | 24 |
Walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means | 31 |
Vanpool or carpool | 45 |
Take a campus shuttle or public transportation | 0 |
Use a motorcycle, scooter or moped | --- |
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.