| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 65.59 |
| Liaison | Victor Udo |
| Submission Date | Sept. 23, 2019 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Bucknell University
PA-12: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.00 / 1.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
No
Percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample (0-100):
---
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
We have a number of channels for employees to provide feedback
including but not limited to the following:
individual relationships between employees and supervisors
department staff meetings
University Staff Personnel Committee (USPC), a group of elected exempt and
non-exempt staff who manage a feedback system/suggestion box; and who are included as a socializing and sounding board for relevant policy review and input; and more.
HR Roundtable – a forum for managers who are direct reports to the President
and his cabinet members. This group is a resource tor communicating and sharing
ideas; reviewing and providing feedback on policies; sharing information to direct
and indirect reports in a more consistent manner, etc.
University Staff Forum – a monthly meeting open to faculty and staff for
information sharing, presentations, introduction of new staff and more
Faculty Meeting – monthly during the academic year
Diversity Advocates for recruitment searches.
Get to Know Bucknell – orientation for new staff to higher education and
Bucknell University
And many other informal open-door opportunities for staff to speak with leaders, managers or even the President as applicable.
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
Informal review of feedback obatained from any of the above venues either with HR, with Faculty, with our Operations Management Group (direct reports to the President), or with the Presidents necessary.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.