Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 75.90
Liaison Deborah Steinberg
Submission Date Dec. 6, 2021

STARS v2.2

Carnegie Mellon University
EN-10: Community Partnerships

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 3.00 / 3.00 Barbara Kviz
Environmental Coordinator
Facilities Management Services
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

1st Partnership 

Name of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability :
The Breathe Project

Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? :
Yes

Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe?:
Multi-year or ongoing

Which of the following best describes the partnership?:
Sustainability-focused

Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners? :
Yes

A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability:
The Breathe Project is a clearinghouse for information on air quality in Pittsburgh, southwestern Pennsylvania and beyond. We use the best available science and technology to better understand the quality of the air we breathe and provide opportunities for citizens to engage and take action.

The Breathe Collaborative is a coalition of citizens, environmental advocates, public health professionals and academics working to improve air quality, eliminate climate pollution and make our region a healthy and prosperous place to live. The Collaborative powers the Breathe Project through science-based work and a community outreach platform. Carnegie Mellon University’s CREATE Lab and the Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies are collaborators on this project.

https://breatheproject.org/

2nd Partnership

Name of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability (2nd partnership):
Juntos

Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? (2nd partnership):
Yes

Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe? (2nd partnership):
Multi-year or ongoing

Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus? (2nd partnership):
Sustainability-focused

Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners? (2nd partnership):
Yes

A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability (2nd partnership):
Juntos, a student organization advised by the SLICE Office and the Office of International Education (OIE), focuses on creating sustainable, effective initiatives to positively impact Pittsburgh and small communities in Latin America, particularly in Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic. They also strive to raise awareness of cultural and political issues affecting Latin America in the local Pittsburgh community.

They partner with Bridges to Community, an American non-government organization that works primarily in Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic. They coordinate Juntos with a small community in need, and Juntos works with that community for approximately four to five years before transitioning to another. Juntos assists the community in question with sustainable projects on alternative break trips and projects.

3rd Partnership 

Name of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability (3rd partnership):
---

Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? (3rd partnership):
---

Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe? (3rd partnership):
---

Which of the following best describes the partnership? (3rd partnership):
---

Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners? (3rd partnership):
---

A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability (3rd partnership):
---

Optional Fields 

A brief description of the institution’s other community partnerships to advance sustainability:
---

Website URL where information about the institution’s community partnerships to advance sustainability is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.