Case Western Reserve University
OP-2: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
Reporter |
Stephanie
Corbett Director Energy & Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions
Gross GHG emissions
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from stationary combustion | 4,863 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 4,481 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from other sources | 2,204 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 5,461 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported electricity | 66,623 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 95,504 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy | 37,196 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 67,204 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total | 110,886 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 172,650 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon sinks
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Third-party verified carbon offsets purchased | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon storage from on-site composting | 100 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 20 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon storage from non-additional sequestration | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon sold or transferred | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Net carbon sinks | 100 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 20 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
If total performance year carbon sinks are greater than zero, provide:
Compost weight is the sum of what is produced on main campus as well as the University Farm, using a standard volume to weight conversion.
Adjusted net GHG emissions
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Adjusted net GHG emissions | 110,786 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 172,630 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Performance and baseline periods
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Start date | July 1, 2019 | July 1, 2008 |
End date | June 30, 2020 | June 30, 2009 |
A brief description of when and why the GHG emissions baseline was adopted:
President Snyder signed the ACUPCC in 2008, the baseline was adopted for the following year, FY 09
Part 1. Reduction in GHG emissions per person
Weighted campus users
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 4,100 | 3,000 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 24 | 15 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 10 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 10,456 | 8,449 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 4,196 | 5,044 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 282 | 0 |
Weighted Campus Users | 11,818.50 | 10,873.50 |
Metrics used in scoring for Part 1
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user | 9.37 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 15.88 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Percentage reduction in adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user from baseline:
40.96
Part 2. GHG emissions per unit of floor area
Performance year floor area
8,499,923
Gross square feet
Floor area of energy intensive building space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 920,400 Square feet |
Healthcare space | 0 Square feet |
Other energy intensive space | 0 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
10,340,723
Gross square feet
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
0.01
MtCO2e per square foot
A brief description of the institution’s GHG emissions reduction initiatives:
CWRU has invested heavily into mechanical system upgrades and lighting retrofits since the signing of the Presidents Climate Commitment in 2008, including phasing out the need for heating oil on campus. In conjunction with improvements to the electric grid, electric efficiency has increased while electricity emissions have declined over the last 10 years. The steam CWRU purchased historically was sourced entirely from coal, but in FY2017 switched to natural gas, which caused an emissions reduction as well. There were fewer degree days in FY2015-16, which Facilities was able to take advantage of when heating and cooling buildings.
Furthermore, better data tracking for data elements such as refrigerants and fertilizer has brought the GHG inventory closer to reality. Back in FY2009, information provided were estimates from people within Facilities.
Furthermore, better data tracking for data elements such as refrigerants and fertilizer has brought the GHG inventory closer to reality. Back in FY2009, information provided were estimates from people within Facilities.
Website URL where information about the institution's GHG emissions is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
There is a significant change in scope 1&2 emissions from baseline to current. This data has been third-party validated. A great deal of work has been done and investments made on campus to make buildings more efficient and to reduce the energy intensity of campus.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.