Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 53.05 |
Liaison | April Thompson |
Submission Date | Sept. 22, 2023 |
Creighton University
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.75 / 3.00 |
April
Thompson Project and Reporting Coordinator Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
5,000,000
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
Renewables energy
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
0
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
No
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
---
None
The sustainable investment policy:
---
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
No
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
---
Proxy voting
Yes
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
Verbal confirmation in review meetings
Shareholder resolutions
Yes
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
Creighton University actively engaged with corporations in its investment portfolio to promote impact investing for sustainability. The university advocated for responsible investment practices that consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. By encouraging corporations to adopt ESG strategies, Creighton aimed to drive positive environmental and social outcomes.
Divestment efforts and negative screens
Yes
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
Divest of public FF holdings by 2025 and private investments by 2030
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
5
Investor networks
No
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
The university works with the National Jesuit Committee for Investment Responsibility to purchase shares in companies which are being engaged by NJCIR. If engagement is unsuccessful, University would co-sponsor shareholder resolutions.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.