| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68.21 |
| Liaison | Jeremy King |
| Submission Date | Sept. 19, 2022 |
Denison University
IN-40: Sustainability Projects Fund
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Jeremy
King Campus Sustainability Coordinator Office of the President |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Name of the institution’s sustainability projects fund:
Green Hill Fund
Which of the following best describes the primary source of funding for the sustainability projects fund?:
Hybrid
Year the institution’s sustainability projects fund was established:
2,011
A brief description of the institution’s sustainability projects fund:
The purpose of the Green Hill Fund's Sustainable Community Grants Program is to provide funding to implement innovative projects and ideas that enhance sustainability at Denison. It is made possible through the Green Hill Revolving Loan Fund and the John R. Hunting Environmental Venture Fund.
A brief description of the multi-stakeholder decision-making process used to determine which projects receive funding through the sustainability projects fund:
Selection Criteria
A project or idea does not necessarily need to fulfill all of the listed criteria; however, the following components will be considered in the selection process.
• Potential cost savings, return on investment and/or measurable benefit to the campus community through education and/or promotion of environmental sustainability
• Availability of grant funds
• Innovation
• Overall feasibility of the project/idea
• Positive impact on the broader campus community
• Potential to connect with coursework or research
• If applicable, willingness of nominator(s) to lead or be involved in the implementation of the project/idea.
Applications are reviewed by the Sustainability Director and the Director of Facilities and recommended projects go before the Campus Sustainability Committee for final approval.
A project or idea does not necessarily need to fulfill all of the listed criteria; however, the following components will be considered in the selection process.
• Potential cost savings, return on investment and/or measurable benefit to the campus community through education and/or promotion of environmental sustainability
• Availability of grant funds
• Innovation
• Overall feasibility of the project/idea
• Positive impact on the broader campus community
• Potential to connect with coursework or research
• If applicable, willingness of nominator(s) to lead or be involved in the implementation of the project/idea.
Applications are reviewed by the Sustainability Director and the Director of Facilities and recommended projects go before the Campus Sustainability Committee for final approval.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.