Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 49.34 |
Liaison | John Stolz |
Submission Date | March 5, 2021 |
Duquesne University
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.65 / 5.00 |
Gabriella
Zuccolotto Graduate Assistant Center for Environmental Research & Education (CERE) |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
8,290
Full-time equivalent of employees:
1,894
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
36.42
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
An updated Parking, Traffic and Transportation Demand Management Strategies Technical Memorandum #2. Prepared by Trans Associates Engineering Consultants, Inc. for Duquesne University on December 10, 2018.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
17.50
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
An updated Parking, Traffic and Transportation Demand Management Strategies Technical Memorandum #2. Prepared by Trans Associates Engineering Consultants, Inc. for Duquesne University on December 10, 2018.
Optional Fields
Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
Single-occupancy vehicle | 63.58 | 82.50 |
Zero-emissions vehicle | --- | --- |
Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 12.88 | 1.60 |
Vanpool or carpool | 0 | 0.40 |
Public transport or campus shuttle | 21.50 | 13.50 |
Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 2.04 | 1.80 |
Distance education / telecommute | --- | 0.20 |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The Parking, Traffic and Transportation Demand Management Strategies report included all students as opposed to solely commuters. As a result, the exact numbers stated above are not found in the document but were calculated using the report data. Additionally, the "other" category in the report was used as data for the motorcycle, scooter or moped category above. Relevant information was found on page 23 of the document.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.