| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 52.95 |
| Liaison | Chad Carwein |
| Submission Date | Jan. 16, 2020 |
East Carolina University
EN-6: Assessing Sustainability Culture
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 1.00 |
Chad
Carwein University Sustainability Manager HSC Facilities Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution conduct an assessment of sustainability culture?:
Yes
Which of the following best describes the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered to::
A subset of the campus community or a sample that may not be representative of the entire community
Which of the following best describes the structure of the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered::
Longitudinally to measure change over time
A brief description of how and when the cultural assessment(s) were developed and/or adopted:
ECU added the NSSE Sustainability Education Consortium to our survey of first-year students and seniors in 2018. We plan to add this module to the NSSE moving forward, which the University sends out on a 3-year cycle.
A copy or sample of the questions related to sustainability culture:
A sample of the questions related to sustainability culture or the website URL where the assessment tool is available:
---
A brief description of how representative samples were reached (if applicable) and how the cultural assessment is administered:
ECU sends out the NSSE to all first year students and seniors on a 3-year cycle so the survey results do not represent all undergraduate students nor does it include any employees.
A brief summary of results from the cultural assessment:
ECU's consortium comparison group included the following 7 universities: Chatham University, James Madison University, SUNY College at Oneonta, Tennessee State University, Texas A&M International University, University of Central Oklahoma, and Widener University. Of the 20 questions asked in the NSSE Sustainability Education Consortium, compared to the consortium comparison group, ECU's first-year students had a lower mean score that was statistically significant on 5 questions versus ECU's seniors who only had a lower mean score that was statistically significant on 1 question.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Kyle Chapman, Senior Research Associate (IPAR)
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.