| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 55.01 |
| Liaison | Katie Koscielak |
| Submission Date | May 8, 2013 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Cal Poly Humboldt
OP-16: Employee Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.56 / 3.00 |
Traci
Ferdolage Associate Vice President Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution's employees that use more sustainable commuting options:
18.70
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s employees who commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) as their primary method of transportation :
81.30
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s employees who walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means as their primary method of transportation. Please note that this may include on-campus residents:
10.20
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s employees who vanpool or carpool as their primary method of transportation :
5.60
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s employees who take a campus shuttle or public transportation as their primary method of transportation :
2
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution's employees who use a motorcycle, scooter, or moped as their primary method of transportation:
0.90
None
The website URL where information about alternative transportation is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Based on our parking and mobility study done in 2005, we can see that a vast majority of Faculty and Staff commute via single occupancy vehicles (SOV). Most survey respondents were private automobile commuters and it is difficult for other modes to compete with the automobile for flexibility, travel time and reliability. Cost was not reported to be a major factor for these Faculty and Staff respondents. Many SOV commuters indicated that public transit travel times are too long and that service does not stop near their home. A number of respondents indicated that they were unfamiliar with service routes and schedules.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.