Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 55.01 |
Liaison | Katie Koscielak |
Submission Date | May 8, 2013 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Cal Poly Humboldt
PAE-4: Sustainability Plan
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.00 / 3.00 |
TallChief
Comet Director, Office of Sustainability Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have a sustainability plan that meets the criteria for this credit?:
Yes
None
A brief description of how multiple stakeholder groups were involved in developing the plan:
The plan was developed and written by an undergraduate Natural Resources Planning Senior Practicum course, in consultation with the campus Sustainability Coordinator, and various staff with responsibilities in the referenced areas. The plan was then adopted as the campus working plan by the President’s Advisory Committee on Sustainability (PACS). The PACS is comprised of twelve representatives from all major areas of campus, including two student representatives from different areas of campus.
None
A brief description of the plan’s measurable goals :
The plan is divided into nine elements comprising various functional or activity areas of the campus (water, campus landscape, built environment, energy, waste, education, procurement, food services, and transportation) and each element discusses related vision, mission, and goals accompanied by at least two sections outlining objectives with associated timelines - short-term (0-1 yr.), intermediate (1-5 yr.), and/or long-term (5-10 yr.)
None
A brief description of how progress in meeting the plan’s goals is measured:
Progress toward fulfilling the plans goals is measured in several ways, as appropriate for the given goal and the mechanism for indicating progress. Most of the goals in the plan are action or process oriented. Using tools that create baseline conditions, then re-evaluating those same measures at set intervals, such as the AASHE STARS provide the most comprehensive way to measure progress. Another, more direct measure, is formally establishment of a program or process, where none existed before (e.g., food-waste diversion program under Waste).
Starting in 2013 all functions of the university will also be evaluated using a Program review, Evaluation, and Planning (PREP) process to strengthen the quality of programs through evidence-based decision-making and reflective planning. All the goals of the sustainability plan will fall under one of the three responsibility areas of the university (academic programs, student affairs, administrative affairs), so will be inherently entered into the PREP process.
None
The website URL where more information about the sustainability plan is available:
---
None
The year the plan was developed or last updated:
2,009
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The plan is considered a working draft for the Office of Sustainability to use in planning efforts for the nine element areas covered. Once the AASHE STARS process is completed, it is anticipated that the plan will be updated and revised to reflect current direction, progress, and ongoing evaluation efforts (mentioned above in how progress is measured).
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.