| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 69.28 |
| Liaison | Katie Koscielak |
| Submission Date | April 21, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Cal Poly Humboldt
PA-12: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Colleen
Mullery Senior Associate Vice President Faculty Affairs and Human Resources Human Resources and Academic Personnel Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample (0-100):
100
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
Web-based Employee Engagement Survey was conducted using SNAP Survey Professional and administered by the CSU Chancellors Office and distributed to all employees with a 49% response rate during spring semester 2014. Survey results were reported to the University community on November 5, 2014.
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
Results were used to highlight positive areas of work environment and to identify areas for additional inquiry or intervention. Results were used to inform the University's strategic plan. Specific improvements were made in recruitment strategies and in providing additional professional development opportunities, especially for staff. For example, the campus acquired Skillport, a content-based content delivery platform, which provides over 3500 online courses on various topics including computer programs, IT/HR certifications, and business skills along with a library of 20,000 e-books. Skillport can be accessed by all employees and becomes a component of an individualized professional development program.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.