Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 72.07 |
Liaison | Katie Koscielak |
Submission Date | May 7, 2020 |
Cal Poly Humboldt
IN-34: Spend Analysis
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Tawny
Fleming Contracts, Procurement & Accounts Payble Contracts, Procurement & Accounts Payble |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Estimated proportion of the institution’s expenditures that have been subject to a sustainability-related spend analysis:
50 percent or more
A brief description of the institution’s sustainability-related spend analysis:
A staff member of the Contracts & Procurement department annually completes the recycled content report (called the "Buy Recycled Report"), and in doing so is required to look at all the purchases of goods made in the prior fiscal year. This analysis requires review of the majority of institution purchases across commodity categories (e.g., not just office equipment, for example). Each transaction is reviewed and if the commodity falls in to one of the reportable categories, a determination is made as to whether it meets the criteria to be considered recycled content. In the process of completing this activity, 50% or more end up being reviewed to determine whether they meet recycled content criteria. Recycled content review generally entails consideration of environmental performance, but also has tangential impact on social and economic dimensions.
In addition to reviewing expenditures for the recycled content report, Contracts and Procurement also completes a parallel exercise annually to evaluate services and commodities from small business and disabled veteran owned businesses. Results are assembled for a similar report and in this process, 50% or more of the institutions expenditures end up being reviewed to determine whether they meet the criteria.
In addition to reviewing expenditures for the recycled content report, Contracts and Procurement also completes a parallel exercise annually to evaluate services and commodities from small business and disabled veteran owned businesses. Results are assembled for a similar report and in this process, 50% or more of the institutions expenditures end up being reviewed to determine whether they meet the criteria.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
At the DGS State Agency Recognition Awards in January 2020, HSU won the award for Most Improved Large Agency in both SB & DVBE contracting, which further demonstrates HSU's commitment to social performance when selecting the institution's suppliers.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.