Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 53.24 |
Liaison | Alicia Gowan |
Submission Date | June 18, 2024 |
Kwantlen Polytechnic University
AC-1: Academic Courses
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
11.80 / 14.00 |
Alicia
Gowan Sustainability Specialist Campus and Community Planning |
Part 1. Sustainability course offerings
Undergraduate | Graduate | |
Total number of courses offered by the institution | 1,230 | 34 |
Number of sustainability-focused courses offered | 101 | 6 |
Number of sustainability-inclusive courses offered | 132 | 7 |
Percentage of courses that are sustainability course offerings:
Part 2. Sustainability course offerings by department
Number of academic departments with sustainability course offerings:
Percentage of academic departments with sustainability course offerings:
Documentation
Do the figures reported above cover one, two, or three academic years?:
A brief description of the methodology used to complete the course inventory :
73 academic departments (out of 86 at KPU) were included in the inventory based on the following methodology:
- Using KPU's online course repository, called CourseLeaf, KPU's courses were sifted through by department and program code (e.g. HSCI for Health Sciences).
- Only courses that were current, revised, or new were considered for the inventory.
- Each course was examined for its sustainability criteria by analyzing two main sections "course description" and "learning outcomes". A course was considered to be related to/focused on sustainability based on STARS criteria. STARS criteria states “To count as a sustainability course, the course title or description must indicate a primary and explicit focus on sustainability. The course title or description does not have to use the term “sustainability” to count as sustainability-focused if the primary and explicit focus of the course is on the interdependence of ecological and social/economic systems or a major sustainability challenge such as climate change.” As per the requirements from STARS, if a course only included “social components” and did not reference the ecological dimensions in the course description or learning outcomes, then the course was omitted.
- Courses were cross-referenced with KPU’s SDG Mapping Project’s SDG course inventory. This inventory included:
- If courses involved Indigenous content to a significant extent, they were included as a sustainability related/focused course given that Indigenous peoples – the original stewards of the land – have co-existed with nature since time immemorial.
- The inventory excluded:
- Individually-directed courses (e.g. thesis, independent study, practicum)
- Special topic courses (e.g. courses that address emerging issues or specialized content that are offered on an ongoing basis)
- Courses that are strictly practice-oriented. This meant that courses from the following programs were excluded: Brewing, Trades, Nursing, Acupuncture, Art, Health courses dedicated to technique/composition (e.g. Fine Arts). Given KPU is a polytechnic university, this course inventory excludes a significant number of courses/programs.
How were courses with multiple offerings or sections counted for the figures reported above?:
A brief description of how courses with multiple offerings or sections were counted:
Each course was counted as a single course regardless of the number of offerings.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Although this inventory was restricted to course descriptions and learning outcomes in the university's online course repository, a group on campus called the Climate+ Challenge has a self-reported list of courses which faculty members incorporate climate issues into their teachings. This was not cross-referenced for the purposes of simplifying the methodology for this exercise, however, it is valuable to highlight: https://wordpress.kpu.ca/climatepluschallenge/courses/fall-2023-courses/
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.