Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 76.17 |
Liaison | Ian McKeown |
Submission Date | March 5, 2021 |
Loyola Marymount University
OP-2: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
5.71 / 8.00 |
Ian
McKeown Sustainability Officer Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions
Gross GHG emissions
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from stationary combustion | 3,317.48 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 3,309 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from other sources | 170.20 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 219 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported electricity | 6,519.92 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 16,213 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total | 10,007.60 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 19,741 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon sinks
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Third-party verified carbon offsets purchased | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon storage from on-site composting | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon storage from non-additional sequestration | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | --- |
Carbon sold or transferred | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Net carbon sinks | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
If total performance year carbon sinks are greater than zero, provide:
not applicable
Adjusted net GHG emissions
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Adjusted net GHG emissions | 10,007.60 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 19,741 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Performance and baseline periods
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Start date | June 1, 2019 | June 1, 2007 |
End date | May 31, 2020 | May 31, 2008 |
A brief description of when and why the GHG emissions baseline was adopted:
First year of carbon footprint done. benchmark school uses
Part 1. Reduction in GHG emissions per person
Weighted campus users
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 3,200 | 3,195 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 35 | 40 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 0 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 8,213 | 7,187 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 1,763 | 1,716 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 0 | 0 |
Weighted Campus Users | 8,290.75 | 7,486 |
Metrics used in scoring for Part 1
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user | 1.21 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 2.64 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Percentage reduction in adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user from baseline:
54.23
Part 2. GHG emissions per unit of floor area
Performance year floor area
367,401.65
Gross square meters
Floor area of energy intensive building space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 11,363 Square meters |
Healthcare space | 175 Square meters |
Other energy intensive space | 15,972 Square meters |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
406,449.48
Gross square meters
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
0.02
MtCO2e per square meter
A brief description of the institution’s GHG emissions reduction initiatives:
Lighting projects,
transportation projects,
car sharing,
bike program,
shuttles,
energy efficiency contests,
energy retrofits,
education,
water saving devices,
increased recycling,
replaced boilers,
reduced waste,
light sensors,
led replacements,
alternative transportation options.
transportation projects,
car sharing,
bike program,
shuttles,
energy efficiency contests,
energy retrofits,
education,
water saving devices,
increased recycling,
replaced boilers,
reduced waste,
light sensors,
led replacements,
alternative transportation options.
Website URL where information about the institution's GHG emissions is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
GHG has decreased significantly as a result of efficiency upgrades, grid power mix, and offsets. expanding on-campus renewables
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.