Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 74.49 |
Liaison | Ian McKeown |
Submission Date | March 3, 2023 |
Loyola Marymount University
IN-41: Textbook Affordability
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.25 / 0.50 |
Jessica
Hernandez Sustainability Coordinator Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution host a peer-to-peer textbook exchange program, textbook lending library, or alternate textbook project?:
No
A brief description of the textbook exchange program, textbook lending library, or alternate textbook project:
LMU offers Open Educational Resources (OER) and Unlimited User Ebooks. The OER program on campus supports the following:
Increase equity - provides access for all students to the learning materials they need on day one (and also in the future)
Offer faculty creativity and flexibility in course design (faculty have the ability to customize relevant and high quality content to align with unique teaching and learning outcomes)
Create opportunities to engage students with content creation
Support local and global access to teaching and learning as a social justice issue
Reduce the cost of an LMU education for our students
Increase equity - provides access for all students to the learning materials they need on day one (and also in the future)
Offer faculty creativity and flexibility in course design (faculty have the ability to customize relevant and high quality content to align with unique teaching and learning outcomes)
Create opportunities to engage students with content creation
Support local and global access to teaching and learning as a social justice issue
Reduce the cost of an LMU education for our students
Does the institution provide incentives for academic staff that explicitly encourage the authorship, peer review, and/or adoption of open access textbooks?:
Yes
A brief description of the incentives to encourage the authorship, peer review, and/or adoption of open access textbooks:
LMU has offered grants to faculty for converting course materials to free for courses. Awards were based on the scope and scale of the project, cost-savings, and the number of students impacted.
If yes to either of the above, provide:
Optional Fields
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.