| Overall Rating | Bronze |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 31.69 |
| Liaison | Elizabeth Masuen |
| Submission Date | Aug. 30, 2021 |
Metropolitan Community College
OP-5: Building Energy Efficiency
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
3.11 / 6.00 |
Sally
Hopley Coordinator of Sustainable Practices Campus Planning and Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Site energy use per unit of floor area
Performance year energy consumption
| kWh | MMBtu | |
| Imported electricity | 16,217,577 Kilowatt-hours | 55,334.37 MMBtu |
| Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, performance year (report MMBtu):
| MMBtu | |
| Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 67,385 MMBtu |
| Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, performance year:
122,719.37
MMBtu
Performance year building space
1,273,353
Gross square feet
Floor area of energy intensive space, performance year:
| Floor area | |
| Laboratory space | 0 Square feet |
| Healthcare space | 0 Square feet |
| Other energy intensive space | 1,685 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
1,275,038
Gross square feet
Performance year heating and cooling degree days
| Degree days | |
| Heating degree days | 5,705 Degree-Days (°F) |
| Cooling degree days | 1,409 Degree-Days (°F) |
Total degree days, performance year:
7,114
Degree-Days (°F)
Performance period
| Start date | End date | |
| Performance period | Jan. 1, 2020 | Dec. 31, 2020 |
Metric used in scoring for Part 1
13.53
Btu / GSF / Degree-Day (°F)
Part 2. Reduction in source energy use per unit of floor area
Baseline year energy consumption
STARS 2.2 requires electricity data in kilowatt-hours (kWh). If a baseline has already been established in a previous version of STARS and the institution wishes to continue using it, the electricity data must be re-entered in kWh. To convert existing electricity figures from MMBtu to kWh, simply multiply by 293.07107 MMBtu/kWh.
| kWh | MMBtu | |
| Imported electricity | 18,021,391 Kilowatt-hours | 61,488.99 MMBtu |
| Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, baseline year (report MMBtu):
| MMBtu | |
| Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 64,415.27 MMBtu |
| Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, baseline year:
125,904.26
MMBtu
Baseline year building space
1,250,640
Gross square feet
Baseline period
| Start date | End date | |
| Baseline period | Jan. 1, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2019 |
A brief description of when and why the energy consumption baseline was adopted:
The energy baseline reflects the energy efficiency baseline selected for the sustainability master plan: an average of 2018 & 2019. These are two recent years. We did not use 2017 because we had three large buildings come on-line mid-year 2017.
Source energy
3
Total energy consumption per unit of floor area:
| Site energy | Source energy | |
| Performance year | 0.10 MMBtu per square foot | 0.18 MMBtu per square foot |
| Baseline year | 0.10 MMBtu per square foot | 0.20 MMBtu per square foot |
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
7.90
Optional Fields
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices in regard to energy efficiency:
A number of educational events have happened to help educate employees and students about energy and climate change and their relation to each other. In addition, and energy efficiency class was hosted through our Continuing Education department in 2021.
A brief description of energy use standards and controls employed by the institution:
The College uses a building management system to set occupied and unoccupied modes. All new construction and remodels have LED lighting, occupant controls, and setback points.
A brief description of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting and other energy-efficient lighting strategies employed by the institution:
To date, MCC has changed all screw base lamps on the Fort Omaha Campus to LED lighting and is currently working on replacing exterior building lamps as bulbs reach their end of life. All remodels include updates to LED lighting. Almost all external lighting has been upgraded to LEDs.
A brief description of passive solar heating, geothermal systems, and related strategies employed by the institution:
Our Sarpy campus has a hybrid geothermal system.
A brief description of co-generation employed by the institution:
n/a
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace energy-consuming appliances, equipment, and systems with high efficiency alternatives:
As noted in other credits, as remodels occur, the College upgrades to the highest level of energy-efficient equipment, adds occupancy sensors, and upgrades the lighting to LED.
Website URL where information about the institution’s energy conservation and efficiency program is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Data downloaded from Portfolio Manager, heating and cooling degree days are from the state climatology office database.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.