| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 50.00 |
| Liaison | Stars UM6P |
| Submission Date | Aug. 31, 2020 |
University Mohammed VI Polytechnic
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
3.00 / 5.00 |
Maryame
JEBBARI Sustainable Developpment PMO Sustainable Developpment |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
1,395.77
Full-time equivalent of employees:
714
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
72.60
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
For students using sutainable transportation, this mainly includes non resident students using the commun transportation of the campus fleet (Benguerir Commuting) and resident students using the campus fleet (Lydex Commuting) to come to the university. The first formula details the frequency and the percentage of occupated places in each Bus according to the transportation manager.
As for other resident students, they use electrical scooters, walk and bicycles inside the campus. They also use train, carpooling or buses to go home during holidays. The small capacity of the parking that is essentially reserved to the staff and to the campus fleet cars had led us to assess that at least 90% of Students living at the campus effectively use sustainable transportation mode in their daily life at the campus.
As for other resident students, they use electrical scooters, walk and bicycles inside the campus. They also use train, carpooling or buses to go home during holidays. The small capacity of the parking that is essentially reserved to the staff and to the campus fleet cars had led us to assess that at least 90% of Students living at the campus effectively use sustainable transportation mode in their daily life at the campus.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
35.14
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
Concerning the staff using sustainable transportation, we have split them into two categories : the first group is non resident staff using commun transporation of the campus fleet commuting to Benguerir and marrakech. The second group is resident staff at annex villas and who are using the campus fleet from/To the university.
The formula details the frequency and the occupated places in each Bus according to the transportation manager and the information communicated by the HR department (Cities of residence, number of Personal Cars ...)
The formula details the frequency and the occupated places in each Bus according to the transportation manager and the information communicated by the HR department (Cities of residence, number of Personal Cars ...)
Optional Fields
| Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
| Single-occupancy vehicle | --- | --- |
| Zero-emissions vehicle | --- | --- |
| Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | --- | --- |
| Vanpool or carpool | --- | --- |
| Public transport or campus shuttle | --- | --- |
| Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | --- | --- |
| Distance education / telecommute | --- | --- |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.