Montana State University
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.50 / 3.00 |
Paul
Edlund Project Coordinator Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Institution-wide sustainable procurement policies
No
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
---
The policies, guidelines or directives:
---
Part 2. Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Yes
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
Institution employs LCCA less comprehensively, e.g. for certain types of systems or projects and not others
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
MSU University Services performs energy studies for buildings or remodel projects larger than 10,000 sq ft. to evaluate system alternates and select arrangements with the lowest Life Cycle Cost.
Part 3. Product-specific sustainability criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products and/or services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically intensive products and services
Yes
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
Campus-wide Contract for custodial products supplier had extensive criteria used for award based on green janitorial chemicals. From the RFP: "The successful vendor shall economically and efficiently supply the University with green janitorial chemicals that carry the Green Seal™ and/or EcoLogo™ certification or a chemically equivalent product as well as related paper products. Campus-Wide contract is in effect since December 22, 2016. Contract was renewed through December 31, 2021 and has renewal options to add two additional years to this contract.
Consumable office products
Yes
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:
Campus-wide Contract for custodial products supplier had extensive criteria used for award based on green janitorial chemicals. from the RFP: "The successful vendor shall economically and efficiently supply the University with green janitorial chemicals that carry the Green Seal™ and/or EcoLogo™ certification or a chemically equivalent product as well as related paper products". Campus-Wide contract is in effect since December 22, 2016. Contract was renewed through December 31, 2021 and has renewal options to add two additional years to this contract.
Other paper product purchases come from the State office supply contracts. These contracts ensure paper purchased has high post consumer content.
Other paper product purchases come from the State office supply contracts. These contracts ensure paper purchased has high post consumer content.
Furniture and furnishings
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:
---
Information Technology (IT) and equipment
Yes
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:
Vast majority of IT products and services purchased off NASPO Valuepoint contract for Dell and Apple Computers. These contracts were awarded with environmental impacts as a large part of the consideration criteria. These contracts include an environmentally preferable purchasing commitment. This commitment includes requirements for EPEAT Registration and Energy Star® compliant products.
Food service providers
Yes
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:
MSU's Primary Food vendor was selected with a large part of the evaluation criteria based on sustainability requirements. Likewise for Concessions and Pour Rights contracted vendors.
Garments and linens
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
---
Professional service providers
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:
---
Transportation and fuels
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
---
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.