Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 68.35 |
Liaison | Jessica Bast |
Submission Date | Aug. 9, 2022 |
North Carolina State University
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.72 / 5.00 |
Jessica
Bast Sustainability Program Coordinator University Sustainability Office |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
1,950,000,000
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 48,400,000 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 9,300,000 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 12,400,000 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
The NC State Foundation established a socially responsible fund in 2014 from proceeds gifted by the Park Foundation. The spending off of this fund is used to support the Universities Park Scholarship Program. Managers include Generation Investment Management, Brown Advisory, Breckinridge, Vanguard, SGI, and Boston Trust Walden.
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
3.59
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
No
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
---
None
The sustainable investment policy:
---
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
Yes
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
Best in sector criteria as well as positive and negative filters are used in the evaluation of thirteen key components of environment, social and governance to determine the fund's overall risk tolerance. These components include, but are not limited to, environment & natural resource use, labor rights and supply chain management, human rights and community impact, product quality and safety, corporate governance, animal welfare; defense & weapons; nuclear power reactor ownership; nuclear power essential components, tobacco, alcohol, gambling, and shareholder advocacy and engagement.
Proxy voting
No
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
---
Shareholder resolutions
No
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
---
Divestment efforts and negative screens
No
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
---
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
---
Investor networks
No
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
---
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.