Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 71.36 |
Liaison | Michael Chapman |
Submission Date | Sept. 20, 2023 |
Nova Scotia Community College
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Martha
MacGowan Project Assistant- Sustainability Facilities & Engineering |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Yes
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
External audit
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Emily Gillis, EP- Project Manager, Atlantic Environment
Sarah MacKenzie, Environmental Scientist
both are with WSP Canada Inc.
Sarah MacKenzie, Environmental Scientist
both are with WSP Canada Inc.
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
The NSCC sustainability team met with the WSP Canada consulting team to review STARS 2.2 and the review process. As NSCC completed credit reports the team from WSP reviewed them and used the STARS review template to make comments. An initial review was completed by WSP and the template was sent to NSCC. NSCC reviewed all the comments for each credit and addressed them and they were returned to WSP for a second review. The second review was returned to NSCC for final comments.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
---
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
---
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
---
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.