| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 64.03 |
| Liaison | Katie Beitz |
| Submission Date | March 3, 2023 |
Oklahoma State University
PA-13: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.46 / 1.00 |
Kristeena
Blaser Sustainability Coordinator Energy Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees assessed, directly or by representative sample:
46.30
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
The results from the fall 2020 campus climate survey are in. The data was generated from over 2,600 employee responses to a variety of questions related to inclusivity on campus. Last spring and this fall, a campus climate survey was sent to both OSU students and employees to help inform our efforts.
Nine categories were explored, including 1. Inclusion/Support, 2. Belonging, 3. Working with Others, 4. Experience at OSU, 5. Concern, 6. D-Course Issues, 7. Improvement, 8. Discussion with Others, and 9. Equity. Each section explored whether there were significant differences among each of the following demographic variables: Disability, Ethnicity, Campus Affiliation, College Affiliation, Employee Type, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Religion, Marital Status, and Race. Key findings from the report indicate an overall positive sentiment.
Nine categories were explored, including 1. Inclusion/Support, 2. Belonging, 3. Working with Others, 4. Experience at OSU, 5. Concern, 6. D-Course Issues, 7. Improvement, 8. Discussion with Others, and 9. Equity. Each section explored whether there were significant differences among each of the following demographic variables: Disability, Ethnicity, Campus Affiliation, College Affiliation, Employee Type, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Religion, Marital Status, and Race. Key findings from the report indicate an overall positive sentiment.
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation:
According to the executive summary, which highlights significant statistical deviations for specific groups, participants who identified as cisgender had a higher rank on the following factors than participants who identified as transgender: Inclusion/support, experience at OSU, belonging, working with others, discussion with others, and equity.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.