| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 71.89 |
| Liaison | Isabel Savransky |
| Submission Date | Nov. 14, 2023 |
Ontario Tech University
AC-6: Sustainability Literacy Assessment
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
4.00 / 4.00 |
Isabel
Savransky Sustainability & Asset Planner Office of Campus Infrastructure and Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution conduct an assessment of the sustainability literacy of its students?:
Yes
Which of the following best describes the literacy assessment? The assessment is administered to::
The entire (or predominate) student body, directly or by representative sample
Which of the following best describes the structure of the assessment? The assessment is administered as a::
Pre- and post-assessment to the same cohort or to representative samples in both a pre- and post-test
A copy of the questions included in the sustainability literacy assessment(s):
---
A list or sample of the questions included in the sustainability literacy assessment or the website URL where the assessment tool may be found:
List of questions asked: https://forms.gle/gB9iyCiDfPDnBCj7A
A brief description of how the literacy assessment was developed and/or when it was adopted:
Collaboration between various departments and faculties on campus as well as feedback from provincial sustainability professionals group. Survey examples from STARs were also referred to.
A brief description of how a representative sample was reached (if applicable) and how the assessment(s) were administered :
The survey was emailed to the entire undergraduate student population and it was open for a span of 2 weeks.
A post-survey assessment is scheduled to be conducted in April
A post-survey assessment is scheduled to be conducted in April
A brief summary of results from the literacy assessment(s):
- 90.6% of respondents knew that the majority of endangered species are at risk due to habitat loss and introduction of non-native species
- 77.6% of respondents understood the term carbon footprint
- 47.1% understood the term environmental racism
- 84.7% understood why locally grown food is more sustainable
- 77.6% of respondents understood the term carbon footprint
- 47.1% understood the term environmental racism
- 84.7% understood why locally grown food is more sustainable
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.