Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 56.33 |
Liaison | Kimberly Post |
Submission Date | July 18, 2017 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Saint Joseph's College - ME
OP-19: Waste Minimization and Diversion
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.98 / 8.00 |
Don
Tanguay Director of Facilities Facilities |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Parts 1 and 2: Waste Minimization
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Materials recycled | 36 Tons | 39 Tons |
Materials composted | 74 Tons | 90 Tons |
Materials donated or re-sold | 2 Tons | 2 Tons |
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 127 Tons | 160 Tons |
Total waste generated | 239 Tons | 291 Tons |
If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:
---
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Year | July 1, 2015 | June 30, 2016 |
Baseline Year | Sept. 1, 2012 | Aug. 31, 2013 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
These are the years where the company that does our hauling was able to give us the most complete data. Additionally, in September of 2013 we rolled out a program making it far easier for faculty and staff to recycle than to dispose of trash by removing trash bins from faculty and staff offices. Recycling bins have remained in offices. Employees need to manage their own trash by delivering it to communal waste management stations.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 705 | 678 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 2 | 4 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds | 1 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 1,995 | 2,649 |
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) | 397 | 618 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 1,165 | 1,653 |
Weighted campus users | 1,098 | 1,381 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.22 Tons | 0.21 Tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
0
Part 3: Waste Diversion
46.86
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
46.86
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No | |
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
Food | Yes |
Cooking oil | Yes |
Plant materials | Yes |
Animal bedding | Yes |
White goods (i.e. appliances) | Yes |
Laboratory equipment | Yes |
Furniture | Yes |
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | Yes |
Scrap metal | Yes |
Pallets | No |
Tires | No |
Other (please specify below) | No |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
---
Optional Fields
Active Recovery and Reuse
---
Recycling Management
---
Does the institution use dual stream (two separate containers for recyclables, e.g. one for paper and another for plastic, glass, and metals) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
---
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling (multiple containers that further separate different types of materials) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
---
Contamination and Discard Rates
---
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed, e.g. efforts to minimize contamination and/or monitor the discard rates of the materials recovery facilities and mills to which materials are diverted:
---
Programs and Initiatives
---
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
Over Earth week we have done major trash audits which have been student led. All trash collected on campus over the course of 24 hours was opened in public and compostables and recyclables were removed. We learned that we could be much more effective at recycling.
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste (e.g. by minimizing packaging and purchasing in bulk):
---
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
Give and Take room has been created
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse (e.g. of electronics, furnishings, books and other goods):
We have created an internal "craigslist" which which call Catherine's List.
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption (e.g. restricting free printing and/or mandating doubled-sided printing in libraries and computer labs):
Each student get 250 free pages per semester when logged in on campus computers. After this limit is exceeded, students must pay.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials (e.g. course catalogs, course schedules, and directories) available online by default rather than printing them:
---
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
We have been promoting our Go Green and Go Home Program now for about 5 years. This year we will partner with Goodwill Industries of Northern New England and set up a donation station in each residence hall. Our efforts are to educate the campus community and minimize the amount of good usable stuff that ends up in the dumpster. We also encourage recycling of all single-sort recyclables. Goodwill will responsibly recycle all broken electronics collected as well.
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.