| Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 27.64 |
| Liaison | Jennifer McLaughlin |
| Submission Date | March 31, 2016 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
South Dakota State University
PA-10: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.37 / 1.00 |
Jennifer
McLaughlin Sustainability Intern Facilities and Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Has the institution conducted an employee satisfaction and engagement survey or other evaluation that meets the criteria for this credit?:
Yes
None
The percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample:
37.30
None
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
SDSU partook in the Great Colleges to Work For program, underwritten by the Chronicle of Higher Education and administered by MondernThink LLC. The survey covers 15 topics, including job satisfaction/support; teaching environment; professional development; compensation, benefits & work/life balance; facilities; policies, resources & efficiency; shared governance; pride; supervisors/department chairs; senior leadership; faculty, administration & staff relations; communication; collaboration; fairness; respect & appreciation. The survey has been administered in 2010, 2012, and 2015. It is sent out randomly to 600 university employees that fall into the categories of administration, faculty, exempt professional staff, and non-exempt staff.
None
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
SDSU is just beginning its analysis of the 2015 survey results. Past efforts to improve in low-scoring areas include: implementing routine coffee/information sessions with administrators and offices across campus to better inform professional staff of happenings on campus, enhanced new staff orientation/welcome programs to better acclimate professional staff to their campus work environment, and follow up surveys specific to professional staff to gather further qualitative responses to areas of strengths or weaknesses.
None
The year the employee satisfaction and engagement evaluation was last administered:
2,015
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s employee satisfaction and engagement assessment is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.