| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 81.02 |
| Liaison | Sam Lubow |
| Submission Date | June 29, 2016 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Stanford University
OP-13: Cleaning and Janitorial Purchasing
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.82 / 1.00 |
Moira
Hafer Sustainability Specialist Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Cleaning Products
54,239
US/Canadian $
Expenditures on cleaning products that are Green Seal or UL ECOLOGO certified and/or Safer Choice labeled (or local equivalents for institutions outside the U.S. and Canada):
25,203
US/Canadian $
Janitorial Paper Products
685,734.49
US/Canadian $
Expenditures on janitorial paper products that are FSC, Green Seal, and/or UL ECOLOGO certified (or local equivalents for institutions outside the U.S. and Canada):
578,606.19
US/Canadian $
Percentage of expenditures on cleaning and janitorial products that are third party certified to meet recognized sustainability standards:
81.60
A brief description of the time period from which the figures reported above are drawn (i.e. one-year time period or representative sample):
This data includes expenditures from Stanford's primary waste contractor, DTZ (now known as C&W), as well as Stanford Athletics' waste contractor, TQM for calendar year 2015. Note that TQM also purchases USDA Certified Biobased Products ($49,558.43 spend in 2015) and Rapidly Renewable Fiber products ($15,593.87 spend in 2015), which are not included in the criteria for this credit but also have sustainability attributes. Only $3,021 out of the $114,865 total TQM janitorial paper product spend in 2015 was for non-rated conventional products, but only $46,692 is Green Seal/FSC certified, which is the amount claimed in this credit for TQM's janitorial paper purchases.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.