Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 69.80
Liaison Kelly Wellman
Submission Date Dec. 19, 2022

STARS v2.2

Texas A&M University
PA-3: Inclusive and Participatory Governance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.38 / 3.00 Kelly Wellman
Sustainability Director
Office of Sustainability & Campus Enrichment
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Part 1. Shared governance bodies

Does the institution have formal participatory or shared governance bodies through which the following stakeholders can regularly participate in the governance of the institution?:
Yes or No
Students Yes
Academic staff Yes
Non-academic staff Yes

A brief description of the institution’s formal participatory or shared governance bodies:
The Student Senate (https://senate.tamu.edu/) consists of 80 Senators, 9 officers, 3 ex-officio officers, and numerous student aides, committee members, and liaisons. The Student Government Association now consists of over 1300 students, 19 committees and commissions, and a budget of approximately half a million dollars.

The Faculty Senate (http://facultysenate.tamu.edu/) Mission Statement:
The mission of the Faculty Senate is to:
-foster a community of mutual respect and cooperation within the university;
-to facilitate effective faculty participation in academic governance;
-to broaden communication in matters of concern to the university; and
-to engage the faculty's skills in the guidance of the university's programs

University Staff Council (https://staff.tamu.edu/) Purpose:
The council will provide a voice and integrate staff perspective by:

1. Acting as a conduit for two-way communication between staff and administration.
2. Engaging staff and bringing their interests before the administration.
3. Identifying university issues and their impact on staff.
4. Exploring and researching possible solutions.
5. Providing options and recommendations to the President.
6. Interacting with other councils.

Part 2. Campus stakeholder representation in governance

Total number of individuals on the institution’s highest governing body:
10

Number of students representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
1

Number of academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
0

Number of non-academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
0

Part 3. Gender equity in governance

Number of women serving as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
2

Percentage of official members of the highest governing body that are women:
20

Website URL where information about the institution’s highest governing body may be found:

Part 4. Community engagement bodies

Does the institution host or support one or more formal bodies through which external stakeholders have a regular voice in institutional decisions that affect them?:
No

A brief description of the campus-community council or equivalent body that gives external stakeholders a regular voice in institutional decisions that affect them:
---

Optional Fields 

Number of people from underrepresented groups serving as official members of the institution’s highest governing body.:
3

Website URL where information about the institution’s governance structure is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
While there is not a formal community engagement body, through the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), the institution hosts the Bryan-College Station Project Coordination Meetings.

Concept: Convene the same group to discuss projects to ensure awareness and continue collaboration and coordination.

Discuss details but focus on project attributes that affect other projects or events, or that may affect vehicle, bus, bike or pedestrian traffic.

Ensure any closures are noted as far in advance as practical. First listing would be to note the closure will happen (e.g., on or before project is let for construction), later updates can estimate a closure date and description and then confirm dates/events.

Involved organizations include the Texas Department of Transportation, Bryan College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization, City of Bryan, City of College Station, Texas A&M University System Facilities Planning & Construction, TAMU Transportation Services, TAMU Campus Planning Design & Construction, TAMU Utilities & Energy Services.

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.