Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 68.78 |
Liaison | Kelly Wellman |
Submission Date | Dec. 20, 2023 |
Texas A&M University
OP-2: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
4.14 / 8.00 |
Les
Williams Associate Dir For Utilities & Energy Management Utilities & Energy Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions
Gross GHG emissions
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from stationary combustion | 129,755 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 233,757 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from other sources | 15,388 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 16,001 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported electricity | 195,102 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 159,646 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total | 340,245 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 409,404 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon sinks
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Third-party verified carbon offsets purchased | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon storage from on-site composting | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon storage from non-additional sequestration | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | --- |
Carbon sold or transferred | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Net carbon sinks | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
If total performance year carbon sinks are greater than zero, provide:
---
Adjusted net GHG emissions
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Adjusted net GHG emissions | 340,245 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 409,404 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Performance and baseline periods
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Start date | Sept. 1, 2021 | Sept. 1, 2003 |
End date | Aug. 31, 2022 | Aug. 31, 2004 |
A brief description of when and why the GHG emissions baseline was adopted:
The baseline was selected because this was the first year we officially began tracking our GHG emissions. Since that time, GHG inventories are completed on a regular basis and monitored for improvement. This baseline was used to inform our Sustainability Master Plan evergreen goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.
Part 1. Reduction in GHG emissions per person
Weighted campus users
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 11,084 | 9,110 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 29 | 167 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 18 | 5 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 62,706 | 44,813 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 8,107 | 7,627 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 1,505 | 0 |
Weighted Campus Users | 54,777.25 | 41,654.25 |
Metrics used in scoring for Part 1
Performance year | Baseline year | |
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user | 6.21 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 9.83 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Percentage reduction in adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user from baseline:
36.80
Part 2. GHG emissions per unit of floor area
Performance year floor area
29,822,916
Gross square feet
Floor area of energy intensive building space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 4,546,290 Square feet |
Healthcare space | 0 Square feet |
Other energy intensive space | 12,025,466 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
50,940,962
Gross square feet
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
0.01
MtCO2e per square foot
A brief description of the institution’s GHG emissions reduction initiatives:
The primary GHG reduction effort is from reducing the energy consumption of the campus. For the baseline year (FY04), the total campus energy consumption was 6.5 million mmBtu for a campus size of 20.5 million GSF. In the measurement year (FY22), the total campus energy consumption was 6.3 million mmBtu for a campus size in excess of 30.9 million GSF. Even though the campus saw tremendous growth, the overall energy consumption was reduced by 3%. This reduction in energy consumption was accomplished with a new combined heat and power plant, a focus on energy efficient chillers, and an aggressive building-level energy reduction program.
Website URL where information about the institution's GHG emissions is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
There will be a difference in the space for OP-2 and the other credits because OP-2 data is delayed by one year and represents FY22, where as the other credits have FY23 data available. Since the numbers for this credit are from FY22, we have used FY22 student, faculty, and staff numbers as well.
Les Williams
Les Williams
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.