| Overall Rating | Reporter - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | |
| Liaison | Karen Marin-Hines |
| Submission Date | March 3, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Texas Tech University
AC-6: Sustainability Literacy Assessment
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
Reporter |
Lisa
Simmons Section Coordinator Planning & Administration |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution conduct an assessment of the sustainability literacy of its students (i.e. an assessment focused on student knowledge of sustainability topics and challenges)?:
Yes
Which of the following best describes the literacy assessment? The assessment is administered to::
A subset of students or a sample that may not be representative of the predominant student body
Which of the following best describes the structure of the assessment? The assessment is administered as a::
Pre- and post-assessment to the same cohort or to representative samples in both a pre- and post-test
A copy of the questions included in the sustainability literacy assessment(s):
---
A sample of the questions included in the sustainability literacy assessment or the website URL where the assessment tool may be found:
http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2012_03_Global-Warming’s-Six-Americas-Screener-Manual.pdf
A brief description of how the literacy assessment was developed and/or when it was adopted:
The survey consists of the short 35-question version of the Six Americas of Global Warming survey and the Pew Political Typology Quiz.
A brief description of how a representative sample was reached (if applicable) and how the assessment(s) were administered :
Run before/after surveys on a limited number of the graduate courses offered by faculty affiliated with the Climate Science Center.
A brief summary of results from the literacy assessment(s), including a description of any measurable changes over time:
The results have not been analyzed yet.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.