| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 57.59 |
| Liaison | Maria Ayala |
| Submission Date | Dec. 26, 2018 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ
IN-18: Pre-Submission Review
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Melanie
Valencia Sustainability Officer Innovation and Sustainability Office |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Mary Ellen Mallia, Director of Sustainability, University of Albany.
A brief description of the review process:
A pre submission review process was completed with a revision from University of Albany. A first revision was submitted by the reviewer, data, supporting documents or clarifications where developed to address the reviewer´s comments and submitted for a second review. For example, revision of web site links, reconsideration of credit pursue, inclusion of more detailed descriptions. After the 2nd submission, the reviewer issued final comments on the changes made to affirm that the identified inconsistencies where addressed. The revision submission and response process is visualized for each applicable credit is presented in the uploaded Stars review template.
Which of the following describes the review process?:
Independent reviewer(s)
Affirmation from the reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template:
Optional Fields
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 2nd reviewer:
---
Affirmation from a 3rd reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 3rd reviewer:
---
Affirmation from a 4th reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 4th reviewer:
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.