Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 83.80
Liaison Breeana Sylvas
Submission Date March 1, 2019
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

University of California, Merced
IC-1: Institutional Boundary

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete N/A Breeana Sylvas
Assistant Director
Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Institution type: Associate (i.e., short-cycle), Baccalaureate, Doctoral/Research, or Master's:
Doctoral/Research

Institutional control (Public, Private for-profit, or Private non-profit):
Public

A brief description of the institution’s main campus and other aspects of the institutional boundary used to complete this report:
UC Merced existing campus has seventeen (17) buildings that make up 1.7 million gross square feet. Additional buildings will be added to the university's footprint as part of the campus 2020 project development, a public private partnership that expands the university's existing built footprint by (13) buildings that will make up 1.2 million gross square feet. The total campus mixed used land and building footprint is 274 acres. The total university area is 1026 acres and includes mixed use, reserve, support and environmental research land, as well as active and passive open spaces.

Which of the following features are present on campus and which are included within the institutional boundary?:
Present? Included?
Agricultural school No No
Medical school No No
Other professional school with labs and clinics (e.g. dental, nursing, pharmacy, public health, veterinary) No No
Satellite campus No No
Farm larger than 5 acres or 2 hectares No No
Agricultural experiment station larger than 5 acres or 2 hectares No No
Hospital No No

If there are features present that are not included within the boundary, provide:

The rationale for excluding any features that are present from the institutional boundary:
---

Optional Fields

Additional documentation to support the submission :
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.