| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.77 |
| Liaison | Andrew Porter |
| Submission Date | March 6, 2020 |
University of Cincinnati
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.45 / 5.00 |
Daniel
Hart Sustainability Coordinator Planning + Design + Construction |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
33,419
Full-time equivalent of employees:
7,108
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
56
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
A combination of city and regional transportation modeling data, internal UC data (e.g. student and staff records), has been used over the past decade to estimate commuting patterns and associated GHG emissions.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
16
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
A combination of city and regional transportation modeling data, internal UC data (e.g. student and staff records), has been used over the past decade to estimate commuting patterns and associated GHG emissions.
Optional Fields
| Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
| Single-occupancy vehicle | 41 | 84 |
| Zero-emissions vehicle | --- | --- |
| Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 41 | 2 |
| Vanpool or carpool | 5 | 8 |
| Public transport or campus shuttle | 9 | 5 |
| Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 1 | 0 |
| Distance education / telecommute | --- | 1 |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.