| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 75.86 |
| Liaison | Tess Esposito |
| Submission Date | March 2, 2018 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Dayton
IN-18: Pre-Submission Review
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 0.50 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Milena Pisani, Graduate Assistant, Hanley Sustainability Institute
Ryan Shea, Graduate Assistant, Hanley Sustainability Institute
A brief description of the review process:
As sections were completed, the reviewers did a first review of the sections using the STARS Review Template to check common errors and make comments. As comments were addressed, responses to the reviewers were recorded in the same spreadsheet. Finally, the reviewers re-reviewed the sections that had pending comments and addressed any remaining issues prior to updating the final status in the spreadsheet. Meetings between the reviewers and those compiling the report were held frequently in the last few weeks of the review process to discuss comments.
Which of the following describes the review process?:
Internal reviewer(s)
Affirmation from the reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template:
Optional Fields
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 2nd reviewer:
---
Affirmation from a 3rd reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 3rd reviewer:
---
Affirmation from a 4th reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 4th reviewer:
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.