Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 74.69 |
Liaison | Tess Esposito |
Submission Date | Feb. 9, 2022 |
University of Dayton
OP-21: Water Use
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
4.00 / 4.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Level of ”Physical Risk Quantity” for the institution’s main campus as indicated by the World Resources Institute Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas:
Low to Medium
Part 1. Reduction in potable water use per person
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water withdrawal | 270,326.67 Cubic meters | 597,377.62 Cubic meters |
Potable water use:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use | 270,326.67 Cubic meters | 597,377.62 Cubic meters |
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Period | July 1, 2019 | June 30, 2020 |
Baseline Period | Dec. 1, 2010 | Nov. 30, 2011 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
2011 was the first year that the university reported to STARS.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users":
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 6,016 | 5,582 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 8 | 0 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 21 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 10,963 | 10,043 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 2,829 | 2,376 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 812 | 355 |
Weighted campus users | 11,262 | 10,443.50 |
Potable water use per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per weighted campus user | 24 Cubic meters | 57.20 Cubic meters |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per weighted campus user from baseline:
58.04
Part 2. Reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Gross floor area | 512,026.15 Gross square meters | 368,315.80 Gross square meters |
Potable water use per unit of floor area:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per unit of floor area | 0.53 Cubic meters per square meter | 1.62 Cubic meters per square meter |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area from baseline:
67.45
Part 3. Reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Vegetated grounds | 66.37 Hectares | 60.70 Hectares |
Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds | 4,073.12 Cubic meters per hectare | 9,841.02 Cubic meters per hectare |
Percentage reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds from baseline:
58.61
Optional Fields
---
A brief description of the institution's water recovery and reuse initiatives:
---
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace plumbing fixtures, fittings, appliances, equipment, and systems with water-efficient alternatives:
Low flow showerheads in all campus housing.
Regular steam and plumbing preventative maintenance program.
Regular steam and plumbing preventative maintenance program.
Website URL where information about the institution’s water conservation and efficiency efforts is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
***Old notes
Performance year GSF differs from IC-2 because we do not have water consumption data for every building. For this section, we have excluded buildings for which we have no water data so that we do not misrepresent our consumption.
2019: using same accounts and GSF as 2018 for 2019 reporting. Updated vegetated area. We'll update to include more accounts when we have the data available.
Performance year GSF differs from IC-2 because we do not have water consumption data for every building. For this section, we have excluded buildings for which we have no water data so that we do not misrepresent our consumption.
2019: using same accounts and GSF as 2018 for 2019 reporting. Updated vegetated area. We'll update to include more accounts when we have the data available.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.