Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 52.40 |
Liaison | Andy Mitchell |
Submission Date | Sept. 11, 2014 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of Illinois Chicago
IN-3: Innovation 3
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Cynthia
Klein-Banai Associate Chancellor for Sustainability Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Title or keywords related to the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
The Sustainability Strategic Thinking Process
None
A brief description of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
Under Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and Provost, Lon Kaufman and Mark Donovan, Vice Chancellor for Administrative Services, UIC has begun the Sustainable Strategic Thinking (SST) process to define sustainability for UIC and how it connects with the long-term strategic goals of the campus. As such, the Sustainability Strategic Thinking Advisory Committee and Sustainability Strategic Thinking Steering Committee have been charged with overseeing this process. The goals of the SST process are to view the sustainability of UIC in areas beyond ecology and the environment, such as economics, resources, and social equity. The SST process was approached by created a two-phase approach to Sustainability Strategic Thinking, one of which being the assets-based approach. The assets-based approach was adapted from the Field Museum’s work engaging Chicago communities in sustainability and climate action, which adapted asset-based community development methodologies. This method for developing a tailored sustainability integration strategy takes UIC’s particular strengths in sustainability for crafting a plan for sustainability. Assets in the areas of research, operations, curriculum, and community were identified and analyzed by the Office of Sustainability and the Working Groups to define a set of asset matrices. The end result of assets-based approach to Sustainability Strategic Planning revealed a wide assortment of individuals, programs, centers, courses, research, activities and projects that contribute to sustainability across campus. Because campus sustainability needs broad innovation and continuous improvement, the university must become a learning organization with nearly everyone publicly engaging and learning. By increasing pride in what we are doing now, we increase excitement and engagement in sustainability because people begin to see what of their work and what they care about is connected to sustainability.
Currently, SST Committee members are identifying campus stakeholders in the following classifications: Research, Teaching & Learning, Economic Development, Community Engagement, and Campus Climate. Campus stakeholders will provide their input during the month of March. After analyzing the feedback gained from campus stakeholders, it's anticipated that the final report on SST will be published in July of 2014.
None
A brief description of any positive measurable outcomes associated with the innovation (if not reported above):
---
None
A letter of affirmation from an individual with relevant expertise:
None
Which of the following STARS subcategories does the innovation most closely relate to? (Select all that apply up to a maximum of five):
Yes or No | |
Curriculum | No |
Research | No |
Campus Engagement | Yes |
Public Engagement | Yes |
Air & Climate | No |
Buildings | No |
Dining Services | No |
Energy | No |
Grounds | No |
Purchasing | No |
Transportation | No |
Waste | No |
Water | No |
Coordination, Planning & Governance | Yes |
Diversity & Affordability | Yes |
Health, Wellbeing & Work | Yes |
Investment | No |
None
Other topic(s) that the innovation relates to that are not listed above:
---
None
The website URL where information about the innovation is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.