Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 65.19 |
Liaison | Justin Mog |
Submission Date | Feb. 13, 2016 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of Louisville
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.44 / 1.00 |
Curtis
Monroe [former] Asst Dir Purch/Materials Mgmt Purchasing |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase office paper that has recycled content and/or is certified to meet multi-criteria sustainability standards for paper?:
Yes
None
A copy of the paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
---
None
The paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
30% post-consumer waste recycled paper is the standard for all applications where economic use of paper and quality of service is not compromised or the health and safety of employees prejudiced.
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed :
Copy paper is purchased through the central stock room and resold to departments on campus. This is the only approved method of procuring white letter and legal size copy paper.
None
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on office paper)?:
Yes
None
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
Expenditure Per Level | |
10-29 percent | 1,477 US/Canadian $ |
30-49 percent | 211,885 US/Canadian $ |
50-69 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled label) | 144 US/Canadian $ |
None
Total expenditures on office paper :
333,561.97
US/Canadian $
None
The website URL where information about the paper purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.