| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 47.40 |
| Liaison | Morgan Hartman |
| Submission Date | Feb. 26, 2016 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Nebraska - Lincoln
AC-11: Access to Research
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.00 / 2.00 |
Paul
Royster Scholarly Communications UNL Libraries |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total number of institutional divisions (e.g. schools, colleges, departments) that produce research:
11
Number of divisions covered by a policy assuring open access to research:
11
None
A brief description of the open access policy, including the date adopted and repository(ies) used:
The University of Nebraska–Lincoln Digital Common Repository was established in 2005 and has grown to become the second largest institutional repository for faculty research in the United State. It hosts more than 66,315 documents, including 13,000 dissertations, and 53,000 faculty articles, monographs, reviews, white papers, technical reports, conference presentations, musical scores, and creative works.
The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska protects the copyright ownership of the authors of any scholarly communication. Therefore participation in this program is not mandatory. However the Faculty senate endorses open access and the Digital Commons Institutional Repository, and encourages all faculty to use the service.
None
A copy of the open access policy:
---
None
The open access policy:
List of Open Access Policy initiatives passed by faculty, staff, and students can be found at http://www.unl.edu/gsa/national.shtml
Date Revised: April 1, 2016
None
The website URL where the open access repository is available:
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/
Date Revised: March 10, 2016
Date Revised: March 10, 2016
None
A brief description of how the institution’s library(ies) support open access to research:
---
None
The website URL where information about open access to the institution's research is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.