Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 67.34
Liaison Jennifer Andrews
Submission Date July 29, 2014
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.0

University of New Hampshire
IN-4: Innovation 4

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Paul Chamberlin
Associate Vice President for Facilities
Facilities
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

None
Title or keywords related to the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
Oyster River Integrated Watershed Plan for the Town of Durham and the University of New Hampshire

None
A brief description of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
The Town of Durham and the University of New Hampshire (UNH) are currently developing an Integrated Watershed Plan for the Oyster River Watershed and an integrated permit approach to comply with their NPDES wastewater and MS4 stormwater permit obligations instead of maintaining separate and distinct federal permits under a traditional permitting approach. This is in response to new stringent wastewater discharge permit requirements recently issued for communities with wastewater treatment facilities in the Great Bay Estuary region focused on reducing their nitrogen output to levels approaching the limits of best available technology. Meeting these requirements will likely involve substantial capital investments and increased operating costs. This new integrated permit approach will allow the Town of Durham and UNH to combine resources and develop a more balanced and sustainable strategy to achieve the desired nitrogen load reductions through a combination of sustainable Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) upgrades and green nonpoint source controls. The premise of Durham and UNH’s approach is consistent with U.S. EPA’s recently published guidance on Integrated Municipal Stormwater and Wastewater Planning, which is intended to assist municipalities in developing more sustainable and green approaches to addressing the sometimes competing and overlapping stormwater and wastewater permitting requirements.

None
A brief description of any positive measurable outcomes associated with the innovation (if not reported above):
---

None
A letter of affirmation from an individual with relevant expertise:
None
Which of the following STARS subcategories does the innovation most closely relate to? (Select all that apply up to a maximum of five):
Yes or No
Curriculum No
Research No
Campus Engagement No
Public Engagement Yes
Air & Climate No
Buildings No
Dining Services No
Energy No
Grounds No
Purchasing No
Transportation No
Waste No
Water Yes
Coordination, Planning & Governance No
Diversity & Affordability No
Health, Wellbeing & Work No
Investment No

None
Other topic(s) that the innovation relates to that are not listed above:
Biodiversity, ecosystem services

None
The website URL where information about the innovation is available:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.