Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 43.88 |
Liaison | Matt Wolsfeld |
Submission Date | Jan. 30, 2015 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of Saskatchewan
AC-6: Sustainability Literacy Assessment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.02 / 4.00 |
Margret
Asmuss Sustainability coordinator The office of sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
The percentage of students assessed for sustainability literacy (directly or by representative sample) and for whom a follow-up assessment is conducted:
0.32
Date Revised: Feb. 4, 2015
None
The percentage of students assessed for sustainability literacy (directly or by representative sample) without a follow-up assessment:
0.16
Date Revised: Feb. 4, 2015
None
A copy of the questions included in the sustainability literacy assessment(s):
None
The questions included in the sustainability literacy assessment(s) :
---
None
A brief description of how the assessment(s) were developed:
Our assessment was developed based on three areas
a) Knowledge
b) Belief/attitude
c) Practice
We administered a pilot survey to a class of undergraduate students during the fall 2014 and refinements were made based on that pilot, Another test survey will be conducted in early 2015, and again refinements will be made on the basis of the result of and feedback on that test survey.
None
A brief description of how the assessment(s) were administered:
We hope to administer a broader survey during the 2015-16 academic year to a defined cohort of first year students, with follow-up with the same cohort of students in three years.
The survey was generated online and was sent to students' NSID
None
A brief summary of results from the assessment(s):
The results are still been worked upon.
None
The website URL where information about the literacy assessment(s) is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Our Sustainability Literacy Assessment is currently being piloted in a limited number of classrooms. We anticipate a comprehensive assessment going forward in 2016.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.