| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 69.91 |
| Liaison | Julie Hopper |
| Submission Date | Dec. 20, 2023 |
University of Southern California
EN-6: Assessing Sustainability Culture
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Julie
Hopper Data Analyst Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution conduct an assessment of sustainability culture?:
Yes
Which of the following best describes the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered to::
The entire campus community (students and employees) directly or by representative sample
Which of the following best describes the structure of the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered::
Longitudinally to measure change over time
A brief description of how and when the cultural assessment(s) were developed and/or adopted:
The culture assessment was developed as part of USC's larger sustainability survey, which includes questions on 1) background information, 2) sustainability literacy (AC.6), 3) sustainability culture and behavior (EN.6), 4) student commuting questions and 5) options to participate in a prize drawing and to sign up for our sustainability newsletter. Each question was created to best serve USC's Assignment: Earth goals and the reporting needs of STARS. (https://sustainability.usc.edu/2028-framework/goals/)
The full survey was initially developed by the staff in the Office of Sustainability (OoS) at USC in February 2022. The full sustainability survey was reviewed in 2022 and again in 2023 by faculty in the Environmental Studies Program, students and faculty in the Presidential Working Group (PWG) engagement committee, students in the President’s Sustainability Internship Program, several students in the Environmental Student Assembly (ESA) e-board committee, and several additional faculty, postdocs and graduate students. OoS staff edited the survey based on this feedback. In 2022, we additionally sent out the full sustainability survey for external review by sustainability experts at Arizona State University, California Institute of Technology and the University of California, Los Angeles. All comments and edits were addressed in the final versions of the survey for each year before launching the survey in the Spring of 2022 and in 2023.
In 2023, we improved word choice in several questions and answer options to improve clarity. We integrated several new question and answer options into the culture and behavior section of the survey to provide better metrics on our progress in each of our Assignment: Earth Goals.
The full survey was initially developed by the staff in the Office of Sustainability (OoS) at USC in February 2022. The full sustainability survey was reviewed in 2022 and again in 2023 by faculty in the Environmental Studies Program, students and faculty in the Presidential Working Group (PWG) engagement committee, students in the President’s Sustainability Internship Program, several students in the Environmental Student Assembly (ESA) e-board committee, and several additional faculty, postdocs and graduate students. OoS staff edited the survey based on this feedback. In 2022, we additionally sent out the full sustainability survey for external review by sustainability experts at Arizona State University, California Institute of Technology and the University of California, Los Angeles. All comments and edits were addressed in the final versions of the survey for each year before launching the survey in the Spring of 2022 and in 2023.
In 2023, we improved word choice in several questions and answer options to improve clarity. We integrated several new question and answer options into the culture and behavior section of the survey to provide better metrics on our progress in each of our Assignment: Earth Goals.
A copy or sample of the questions related to sustainability culture:
A sample of the questions related to sustainability culture or the website URL where the assessment tool is available:
See attached document above.
A brief description of how representative samples were reached (if applicable) and how the cultural assessment is administered:
Survey Distribution Tactics:
• The survey was launched through USC Qualtrics via an anonymous link option in the Spring of 2022 and the Spring of 2023. The survey remained open for ~3 weeks for each survey year.
•Mass emails were distributed to all USC students, postdocs, staff and faculty (UPC, HSC and satellite campuses) by the Office of the Senior Vice President for Administration and the Office of Sustainability.
• Additional emails and fliers were sent out by USC student organizations and staff units to their members.
• Signs were put up around USC UPC campus.
• Incentives included a chance to win one of twenty $100 USC Bookstore gift cards. Gift cards were distributed to 20 lucky survey participants after the close of the survey for each year.
In 2022, 5,486 respondents completed the entire survey. Representation (# of survey respondents by role/ # of individuals in that role at USC via population data provided by HR) included 8% of Faculty, 12% of Staff, 12% of Postdocs and Visiting Scholars, 6% of undergraduate students and 6% of graduate students.
In 2023, 2,974 respondents completed the entire survey. Representation from USC's population included 4% of Faculty, 6% of Staff, 10% of Postdocs and Visiting Scholars, 3% of undergraduate students and 3% of graduate students.
• The survey was launched through USC Qualtrics via an anonymous link option in the Spring of 2022 and the Spring of 2023. The survey remained open for ~3 weeks for each survey year.
•Mass emails were distributed to all USC students, postdocs, staff and faculty (UPC, HSC and satellite campuses) by the Office of the Senior Vice President for Administration and the Office of Sustainability.
• Additional emails and fliers were sent out by USC student organizations and staff units to their members.
• Signs were put up around USC UPC campus.
• Incentives included a chance to win one of twenty $100 USC Bookstore gift cards. Gift cards were distributed to 20 lucky survey participants after the close of the survey for each year.
In 2022, 5,486 respondents completed the entire survey. Representation (# of survey respondents by role/ # of individuals in that role at USC via population data provided by HR) included 8% of Faculty, 12% of Staff, 12% of Postdocs and Visiting Scholars, 6% of undergraduate students and 6% of graduate students.
In 2023, 2,974 respondents completed the entire survey. Representation from USC's population included 4% of Faculty, 6% of Staff, 10% of Postdocs and Visiting Scholars, 3% of undergraduate students and 3% of graduate students.
A brief summary of results from the cultural assessment:
Please see the url links below to review the full results from our 2022 and 2023 Sustainability Surveys: https://sustainability.usc.edu/survey/
The 2023 sustainability survey report is also attached under 'Optional Fields' below.
Culture and Behavior assessment highlight from both the 2022 and 2023 surveys:
• There is a significant positive effect of sustainability education and engagement on literacy and behavior scores of respondents.
Behavior and Culture assessment highlights from the 2023 survey included:
• We saw a ~4% decrease in the culture and behavior scores compared to the scores in 2022.
• > 75% of respondents have a moderate or strong interest in learning more about sustainability practices (an increase from 2022).
• > 52% of respondents ‘usually’ reduce energy use, reduce plastic waste, carefully sort waste, conserve water and conserve paper (an increase from 2022).
• 38% of respondents are interested in getting involved with USC sustainability efforts or groups but have not yet done so (a decrease from 2022.
-This coincided with an increase in the % of respondents that are still involved in sustainability efforts or groups, and also coincided with an increase in the % of respondents that are not interested or don’t have time to participate).
The 2023 sustainability survey report is also attached under 'Optional Fields' below.
Culture and Behavior assessment highlight from both the 2022 and 2023 surveys:
• There is a significant positive effect of sustainability education and engagement on literacy and behavior scores of respondents.
Behavior and Culture assessment highlights from the 2023 survey included:
• We saw a ~4% decrease in the culture and behavior scores compared to the scores in 2022.
• > 75% of respondents have a moderate or strong interest in learning more about sustainability practices (an increase from 2022).
• > 52% of respondents ‘usually’ reduce energy use, reduce plastic waste, carefully sort waste, conserve water and conserve paper (an increase from 2022).
• 38% of respondents are interested in getting involved with USC sustainability efforts or groups but have not yet done so (a decrease from 2022.
-This coincided with an increase in the % of respondents that are still involved in sustainability efforts or groups, and also coincided with an increase in the % of respondents that are not interested or don’t have time to participate).
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
All data are from the 2022 and 2023 Sustainability Surveys which were administered to students, postdocs, staff and faculty at USC during Earth Month each year.
For more information, feel free to watch the recording of the AASHE webinar that our data analyst, Julie Hopper, participated in:
Webinar: Assessing Sustainability Literacy & Culture: Innovations & Lessons Learned by Multiple Institutions
https://hub.aashe.org/browse/video/27000/Webinar-Assessing-Sustainability-Literacy-Culture-Innovations-Lessons-Learned-by-Multiple-Institutions
For more information, feel free to watch the recording of the AASHE webinar that our data analyst, Julie Hopper, participated in:
Webinar: Assessing Sustainability Literacy & Culture: Innovations & Lessons Learned by Multiple Institutions
https://hub.aashe.org/browse/video/27000/Webinar-Assessing-Sustainability-Literacy-Culture-Innovations-Lessons-Learned-by-Multiple-Institutions
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.