Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 69.91 |
Liaison | Julie Hopper |
Submission Date | Dec. 20, 2023 |
University of Southern California
OP-5: Building Energy Efficiency
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.08 / 6.00 |
Zelinda
Welch Associate Director of Sustainability USC Facilities Plant Management |
Part 1. Site energy use per unit of floor area
Performance year energy consumption
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 215,547,746 Kilowatt-hours | 735,448.91 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 742,885 Kilowatt-hours | 2,534.72 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, performance year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 592,363 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, performance year:
Performance year building space
Floor area of energy intensive space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 791,081 Square feet |
Healthcare space | 44,563 Square feet |
Other energy intensive space | 2,505 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Performance year heating and cooling degree days
Degree days | |
Heating degree days | 1,028 Degree-Days (°F) |
Cooling degree days | 1,400 Degree-Days (°F) |
Total degree days, performance year:
Performance period
Start date | End date | |
Performance period | July 1, 2021 | July 30, 2022 |
Metric used in scoring for Part 1
Part 2. Reduction in source energy use per unit of floor area
Baseline year energy consumption
STARS 2.2 requires electricity data in kilowatt-hours (kWh). If a baseline has already been established in a previous version of STARS and the institution wishes to continue using it, the electricity data must be re-entered in kWh. To convert existing electricity figures from MMBtu to kWh, simply multiply by 293.07107 MMBtu/kWh.
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 219,969,648 Kilowatt-hours | 750,536.44 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, baseline year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 475,782 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, baseline year:
Baseline year building space
Baseline period
Start date | End date | |
Baseline period | July 1, 2013 | June 30, 2014 |
A brief description of when and why the energy consumption baseline was adopted:
Source energy
Total energy consumption per unit of floor area:
Site energy | Source energy | |
Performance year | 0.08 MMBtu per square foot | 0.17 MMBtu per square foot |
Baseline year | 0.09 MMBtu per square foot | 0.21 MMBtu per square foot |
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
Optional Fields
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices in regard to energy efficiency:
A brief description of energy use standards and controls employed by the institution:
USC’s centrally-managed climate control system ensures consistent energy monitoring and temperature control throughout every building connected to the system. In summer 2018, USC piloted a program that can schedule Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning, and Cooling (HVAC) system shutdowns in classrooms when they are not in use, and test results exceeded expectations. The Events2HVAC scheduling software was purchased and now is in use at 18 buildings, 237 classrooms, and 40 air-handling units. Through this program, we’re registering energy savings at or above projected levels. In one month alone, this project saved more than 42,000 kWh. The program is projected to extend to an additional 259 classrooms.
A brief description of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting and other energy-efficient lighting strategies employed by the institution:
A brief description of passive solar heating, geothermal systems, and related strategies employed by the institution:
A brief description of co-generation employed by the institution:
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace energy-consuming appliances, equipment, and systems with high efficiency alternatives:
Education on green options:
https://sites.usc.edu/procurement/purchases/sustainable-purchasing/green-certifications/
Sample wording from procurement catalogue:
"Electronics CDW-G- CDW-G’s catalog offers a wide variety of electronics and computer-related products, many of which carry various green certifications. When searching for and reviewing products, look for Environmental Standards on the Technical Specs tab of the product page.
Dell Computers- Dell offers products that carry green certifications. For instructions on how to identify green certifications for a specific product, go to the Dell Computers page."
Website URL where information about the institution’s energy conservation and efficiency program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Energy data are based on FY22
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.