| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 54.38 |
| Liaison | Jennifer Martel |
| Submission Date | Jan. 31, 2023 |
University of the Fraser Valley
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.75 / 3.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Institution-wide sustainable procurement policies
Yes
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
The policies, guidelines or directives:
UFV acknowledges the importance of decision-making on local, environmental, and social impact interests. Sustaining a healthy community requires that procurement best practices go beyond the lowest cost of goods and services and consider the total social and economic impacts. UFV will endeavour to leverage its spending to achieve greater value. Where possible, UFV will apply the following social procurement principles and criteria when planning for and sourcing goods, services, equipment and construction-related works:
1. Social outcomes and community benefits will be assessed prior to any final procurement decision.
2. Supporting social enterprises, not-for-profit businesses, and small and medium enterprises to achieve social value.
3. Support social and economic development outcomes through targeted strategies.
4. Inclusion of endemic materials in project specifications, amenities and landscaping services.
5. Sourcing of environmentally responsible products and equipment.
6. Respect for the values of diversity, equality, and fair labour practices.
7. Elimination of waste and reduce emissions.
1. Social outcomes and community benefits will be assessed prior to any final procurement decision.
2. Supporting social enterprises, not-for-profit businesses, and small and medium enterprises to achieve social value.
3. Support social and economic development outcomes through targeted strategies.
4. Inclusion of endemic materials in project specifications, amenities and landscaping services.
5. Sourcing of environmentally responsible products and equipment.
6. Respect for the values of diversity, equality, and fair labour practices.
7. Elimination of waste and reduce emissions.
Part 2. Life Cycle Cost Analysis
No
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
---
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
---
Part 3. Product-specific sustainability criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products and/or services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically intensive products and services
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
---
Consumable office products
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:
---
Furniture and furnishings
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:
---
Information Technology (IT) and equipment
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:
---
Food service providers
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:
---
Garments and linens
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
---
Professional service providers
Yes
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:
UFV considers sustainability criteria as a Tender Evaluation Criterion. Proponents are asked to describe all initiatives, policies or programs that demonstrate their company’s effort towards sustainable practices and responsibility (Social, Ethical, Environmental). For example:
Social, Ethical, Environmental and Community Value items could include:
1. Provide a narrative describing the company’s Social Procurement Values, including but not limited to the company’s environmental sustainability practices, the company’s ability to monitor and measure social and community value commitments, how they have eliminated or reduced waste in a previous project, etc.
Social, Ethical, Environmental and Community Value items could include:
1. Provide a narrative describing the company’s Social Procurement Values, including but not limited to the company’s environmental sustainability practices, the company’s ability to monitor and measure social and community value commitments, how they have eliminated or reduced waste in a previous project, etc.
Transportation and fuels
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
---
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.