Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 78.59
Liaison Beverley Ayeni
Submission Date March 1, 2024

STARS v2.2

University of Toronto Mississauga
OP-21: Water Use

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.40 / 5.00 Minali Giani
Sustainability Intern
Facilities Management and Planning
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Level of ”Physical Risk Quantity” for the institution’s main campus as indicated by the World Resources Institute Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas:
Medium to High

Part 1. Reduction in potable water use per person 

Total water withdrawal (potable and non-potable combined):
Performance Year Baseline Year
Total water withdrawal 236,147.19 Cubic meters 239,695 Cubic meters

Potable water use:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Potable water use 235,240.75 Cubic meters 239,695 Cubic meters

Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date End Date
Performance Period Jan. 1, 2022 Dec. 31, 2022
Baseline Period Jan. 1, 2011 Dec. 31, 2011

If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:

A brief description of when and why the water use baseline was adopted:
A baseline of 2011 was chosen because this is the earliest we have water data for.

Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users":
Performance Year Baseline Year
Number of students resident on-site 1,686 1,468
Number of employees resident on-site 10 7
Number of other individuals resident on-site 58 53
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment 14,515 9,959
Full-time equivalent of employees 1,292 987
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education 1,094 0
Weighted campus users 11,516.75 8,631.25

Potable water use per weighted campus user:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Potable water use per weighted campus user 20.43 Cubic meters 27.77 Cubic meters

Percentage reduction in potable water use per weighted campus user from baseline:
26.45

Part 2. Reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area

Gross floor area of building space:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Gross floor area 219,056.15 Gross square meters 185,924.82 Gross square meters

Potable water use per unit of floor area:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Potable water use per unit of floor area 1.07 Cubic meters per square meter 1.29 Cubic meters per square meter

Percentage reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area from baseline:
16.70

Part 3. Reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds 

Area of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Vegetated grounds 75.09 Hectares 78.41 Hectares

Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds 3,144.86 Cubic meters per hectare 3,056.95 Cubic meters per hectare

Percentage reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds from baseline:
-2.88

Optional Fields 

A brief description of the institution's water-related behavior change initiatives:
UTM has multiple initiatives in regard to water-related change initiatives. Apart from just the collection of rainwater from UTM’s underground cistern for irrigation and flushing toilets across campus, UTM has implemented a bottled water ban. Bottled water is no longer available for sale at UTM and to ensure that community members have access to drinking water, UTM has installed/upgraded a total of 20 water fountains across campus with bottle filling spouts. 50% of all campus fountains have the ability to refill water bottles, with there being at least one bottle filling station in each building.

https://www.utm.utoronto.ca/green/transforming-our-campus/water

A brief description of the institution's water recovery and reuse initiatives:
UTM has many on-going projects to reduce the amount of potable water used in campus buildings to try and improve recovery, quantity, quality and reusing for rainwater. Some of these projects are the low-flow fixtures that are integrated within many of UTM’s new buildings, rainwater harvesting systems in buildings like the Instructional Building, Deerfield Hall, Health Sciences Complex, and Maanjiwe nendamowinan. This collection of rainwater is recovered and reused for irrigation and toilet flushing. Apart from this, we have green roofs that have planted vegetation to improve both stormwater management across UTM buildings such as the C Communication Culture & Technology Building (CCT), Hazel McCallion Academic Learning Centre, Recreation, Athletics and Wellness Centre (RAWC), and the Innovation Complex. There is also a reduction of water usage in the Central Utilities Plant.

A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace plumbing fixtures, fittings, appliances, equipment, and systems with water-efficient alternatives:
UTM has implemented a series of water-efficient initiatives focused on replacing plumbing fixtures, fittings, appliances, equipment, and systems. The Instructional Centre had a 42 percent reduction in water usage compared to conventional buildings through the installation of low-flow fixtures. Similarly, the Health Sciences Complex has achieved a 65 percent reduction in water consumption. This reduction is attributed to the use of low-flow fixtures and the incorporation of a large underground cistern that collects rainwater. The collected rainwater serves the dual purpose of irrigation and toilet flushing within the complex.

Deerfield Hall has a low-flow plumbing fixture, which greatly reduces water use in the building as compared to a conventional building.

Maanjiwe nendamowinan is extremely water-efficient, using 88 percent less potable water than a conventional building. It alos has a rainwater reuse system, with a capacity of 20,000 gallons which is used for irrigation and toilet flushing.

Website URL where information about the institution’s water conservation and efficiency efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.