Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 45.51
Liaison Mat Thijssen
Submission Date Nov. 6, 2018
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

University of Waterloo
OP-23: Rainwater Management

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.50 / 2.00 Mat Thijssen
Sustainability Manager
Sustainability Office
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Which of the following best describes the institution’s approach to rainwater management?:
No written policies, plans or guidelines, but green infrastructure and LID practices are used

A brief description of the institution’s green infrastructure and LID practices:
Stormwater management systems have been implemented on a case-by-case basis in several locations around campus. The University has 3 permeable pavement installations on South Campus, as well as 3 green roofs and 2 rooftop gardens that support rainwater collection and retention. In addition, it has installed a cistern next to the Environment 3 building that collects and stores rainwater and distributes it back into the building for non-potable consumption in toilets and to water the living wall. On the North Campus, the University utilizes extensive stormwater management infrastructure through several storm ponds. Waterloo’s Northwest Campus development guidelines also include criteria for stormwater management systems throughout the site.

A copy of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines:
---

A brief description of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines that supports the responses above:
The 2012 Northwest Campus Development Guidelines and the Campus Master Plan include information on stormwater management practices to be incorporated into the sites. Case-by-case projects are listed on the Sustainability Office website but are not included as part of policy and/or plans: https://uwaterloo.ca/sustainability/projects-and-initiatives/grounds

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.