| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 58.09 |
| Liaison | Mark Klapatch-Mathias |
| Submission Date | April 15, 2013 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Wisconsin-River Falls
OP-16: Employee Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.76 / 3.00 |
Ian
Johnson Sustainability Coordinator Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution's employees that use more sustainable commuting options:
25.40
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s employees who commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) as their primary method of transportation :
74.60
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s employees who walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means as their primary method of transportation. Please note that this may include on-campus residents:
11.20
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s employees who vanpool or carpool as their primary method of transportation :
12.90
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s employees who take a campus shuttle or public transportation as their primary method of transportation :
0
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution's employees who use a motorcycle, scooter, or moped as their primary method of transportation:
1
None
The website URL where information about alternative transportation is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Information for this credit was gathered from the UWRF Parking Survey, which was last administered in 2005.
'More sustainable Commuting Options' was interpreted as any commuting method that was not driving alone.
As noted on the Parking Survey, good weather vs. bad weather had a negligible impact on transportation modes. The results for this
credit were therefore taken from the "Good Weather" category.
Small differences in the numbers reported in the survey and the numbers reported here are due to rounding.
Recommendations are being made in the Sustainable Campus Community Plan to update the data as soon as possible.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.