| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 69.27 |
| Liaison | Mark Klapatch-Mathias |
| Submission Date | Feb. 29, 2024 |
University of Wisconsin-River Falls
EN-6: Assessing Sustainability Culture
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Mark
Klapatch-Mathias Sustainability Coordinator Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution conduct an assessment of sustainability culture?:
Yes
Which of the following best describes the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered to::
The entire campus community (students and employees) directly or by representative sample
Which of the following best describes the structure of the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered::
Longitudinally to measure change over time
A brief description of how and when the cultural assessment(s) were developed and/or adopted:
UWRF conducted a sustainability culture survey in April 2019 with a follow up assessment in 2022.
A copy or sample of the questions related to sustainability culture:
A sample of the questions related to sustainability culture or the website URL where the assessment tool is available:
See attached file.
A brief description of how representative samples were reached (if applicable) and how the cultural assessment is administered:
The survey was directly emailed out to all students and employees.
A brief summary of results from the cultural assessment:
See attached file for an executive summary of the report.
Here are the top 5 takeaways from the comparison of the 2022 report to the 2019 report:
1. Interest in using campus as a living laboratory to enhance sustainability education increased by 7.2% in 2022 and is the highest priority action related to academics. The 2019 report reflected that the highest priority at that time was increasing number of departments that offer sustainability-inclusive courses.
2. The 2022 results shows more campus support (student and employee) for funding sustainability initiatives and staffing. This is reflected in sustainability being added as a core value and being included in both the academic and strategic plans.
3. Comparison between the 2019 and 2022 report show that there is still not a good understanding of our greenhouse gas emissions and the associated impacts. This continues to be an area where more education is needed. 55% of survey respondents in 2022 list energy as their #1 priority.
4. Implementing an organics collection system on campus continues to be desired by the campus community with 77.4% of survey respondents prioritizing this in the 2022 report compared to 71.6% in the 2019 report.
5. Open comments in the 2022 report are similar to the 2019 report, however, they definitely reflect a desire for more sustainable action on campus.
Here are the top 5 takeaways from the comparison of the 2022 report to the 2019 report:
1. Interest in using campus as a living laboratory to enhance sustainability education increased by 7.2% in 2022 and is the highest priority action related to academics. The 2019 report reflected that the highest priority at that time was increasing number of departments that offer sustainability-inclusive courses.
2. The 2022 results shows more campus support (student and employee) for funding sustainability initiatives and staffing. This is reflected in sustainability being added as a core value and being included in both the academic and strategic plans.
3. Comparison between the 2019 and 2022 report show that there is still not a good understanding of our greenhouse gas emissions and the associated impacts. This continues to be an area where more education is needed. 55% of survey respondents in 2022 list energy as their #1 priority.
4. Implementing an organics collection system on campus continues to be desired by the campus community with 77.4% of survey respondents prioritizing this in the 2022 report compared to 71.6% in the 2019 report.
5. Open comments in the 2022 report are similar to the 2019 report, however, they definitely reflect a desire for more sustainable action on campus.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.