Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 61.91 |
Liaison | Emily Vollmer |
Submission Date | Aug. 2, 2011 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Virginia Tech
PAE-12: Employee Satisfaction Evaluation
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.00 / 2.00 |
Hal
Irvin Associate Vice President Human Resources |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution evaluate employee satisfaction in a way that meets the criteria for this credit?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction:
Human Resources engaged the Virginia Tech Center for Survey Research to develop and administer the university’s employee climate survey to 5,449 administrative and professional faculty, research faculty, and staff employees. Teaching faculty were not surveyed because they had been recently surveyed in 2008. The survey included approximately 80 questions covering seven categories: resources, diversity, principles of community, communication, co-workers, leadership, and supervision. The survey results were shared widely: (1) Human Resources met with senior management to discuss findings for their administrative and academic units; (2) university-wide results were reported to the broader university community; and (3) the Chief Human Resource Officer made presentations and facilitated discussions with various university groups, including faculty and staff governance committees. The survey process will be repeated in the 2011-12 academic year, and will also include teaching faculty.
To view the complete survey results please visit:
http://www.hr.vt.edu/halscorner/archive/index16.html
A follow-up survey focused on one of the issues identified in the broader climate survey was also conducted. Information about this initiative is available at:
http://www.hr.vt.edu/halscorner/index.html
None
The year the employee satisfaction evaluation was last administered:
2,009
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s employee satisfaction evaluation process is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.