Overall Rating Reporter - expired
Overall Score
Liaison Debra Shepard
Submission Date March 1, 2019
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

Wentworth Institute of Technology
OP-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete Reporter Debra Shepard
Sustainability Consultant
N/A
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Part 1 

Has the institution conducted a GHG emissions inventory that includes all Scope 1 and 2 emissions? :
Yes

Does the institution’s GHG emissions inventory include all, some or none of its Scope 3 GHG emissions from the following categories?:
All, Some, or None
Business travel Some
Commuting All
Purchased goods and services None
Capital goods None
Waste generated in operations Some
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 None
Other categories None

A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory, including how the institution accounted for each category of Scope 3 emissions reported above:
Wentworth's GHG emissions inventory was developed in accordance with the WRI / WBCSD "The GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard" using the Clean Air Cool Planet Campus Carbon Calculator, version 9.0. Note that for scope 3, waste total tonnage is tracked in the Carbon Calculator, however the Calculator shows waste emissions as a negative number due to off-site treatment (methane capture & energy production). Wentworth has zeroed out this "carbon sink" in an effort to retain a more conservative estimate of campus GHG emissions.

Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
No

A brief description of the internal and/or external verification process:
---

Documentation to support the internal and/or external verification process:
---

Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 and Part 3 of this credit? (reductions in Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions):
Yes

Part 2 

Gross Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from stationary combustion 4,109 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 3,794 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from other sources 356.60 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 169 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity 3,352.90 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 2,702 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from other sources 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Total 7,818.50 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 6,665 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date End Date
Performance Year Jan. 1, 2016 Dec. 31, 2016
Baseline Year Jan. 1, 2009 Dec. 31, 2009

A brief description of when and why the GHG emissions baseline was adopted (e.g. in sustainability plans and policies or in the context of other reporting obligations):
The GHG emissions baseline was adopted during Wentworth's climate action planning process, as part of meeting the requirements of the Carbon Commitment. The baseline was selected because it was the first year which had the most complete and accurate accounting of campus GHG emissions.

Figures needed to determine total carbon offsets:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Third-party verified carbon offsets purchased (exclude purchased RECs/GOs) 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Carbon sequestration due to land that the institution manages specifically for sequestration 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Carbon storage from on-site composting 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Carbon offsets included above for which the emissions reductions have been sold or transferred by the institution 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Net carbon offsets 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

If total performance year carbon offsets are greater than zero, provide:

A brief description of the offsets in each category reported above, including vendor, project source, verification program and contract timeframes (as applicable):
---

The reporting fields in the table below are reserved for institutions that have NOT already accounted for renewable energy purchases (including RECs and GOs) in their Scope 2 GHG emissions calculations. Other institutions - including all SIMAP users - should report zero ('0') to avoid double-counting. 

Emissions reductions attributable to Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) or Guarantee of Origin (GO) purchases:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Emissions reductions attributable to REC/GO purchases 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

A brief description of the purchased RECs/GOs including vendor, project source and verification program:
---

Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions 7,818.50 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 6,665 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Figures needed to determine “Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Number of students resident on-site 2,021 1,750
Number of employees resident on-site 5 4
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds 0 0
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment 4,050.50 3,441.50
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) 645.50 503.50
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education 0 0
Weighted campus users 4,028.50 3,397.25

Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user 1.94 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent 1.96 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Percentage reduction in adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user from baseline:
1.07

Part 3

Gross floor area of building space, performance year:
1,367,406 Gross square feet

Floor area of energy intensive building space, performance year:
Floor Area
Laboratory space 63,290 Square feet
Healthcare space 0 Square feet
Other energy intensive space 20,179 Square feet

EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
1,514,165 Gross square feet

Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per unit of EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
0.01 MtCO2e per square foot

Optional Fields 

Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
Emissions
Business travel 1,031.50 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Commuting 1,450.10 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Purchased goods and services 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Capital goods 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Waste generated in operations 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Other categories 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

A brief description of the institution’s GHG emissions reduction initiatives, including efforts made during the previous three years:
GHG reduction efforts over the last few years included: LED lighting retrofits, HVAC equipment and controls upgrades, combined heat and power plant repairs and upgrades (started in 2018, due for completion in early 2019), steam trap maintenance program, and LEED Silver (or higher) equivalent green building design & construction strategies including high efficiency HVAC equipment, insulation, controls, etc. The new CEIS building is the latest example (under construction during 2018) which is predicted to save 37% on energy costs compared to baseline construction, and hosts the first solar PV array on campus.

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.